If investment "A" returned 60%, investment "B" returned 3% and Investment "C" returned 15%, collectively, they returned about 26%, BUT. Did you suggest investment amounts on your screens? Playing the lottery is still a bad financial idea, even if your friend (who won) said “I told you so.”ģ. In particular when the hindsight seems to validate you were right. It’s easy to look brilliant when giving selective information. Either way, you're up that proverbial smelly, unsanitary creek. That means (a) they either don't know this fact, are incompetent, and you should not follow them, or (b) they intend to disinform you and. You're pushing the newsletter based on hindsight performance, but yesterday’s performance has near zero power in predicting tomorrow’s performance.īy trying to lure you with past performance, and only past performance, newletters suggest it is repeatable," which the odds heavily don't favor. These, then become the success stories touted by those savvy recommenders.Ģ. A common tactic with a variety of newsletters is to make different recommendations, ensuring gold is struck. If they have 250, then not so impressive. If they have 7, Awesome! The company has super geniuses or is super lucky. This is a list of "top" screens, so how many screens do you have in total? I emailed the company twice and called once with no response.ġ. Pretty impressive, yes? This “tout” was written by a well-known investments research company with over 2 million subscribers. this outperfrmance has not just been a recent phenomenon… Over the years it has been remarkably consistent…” Dear Asura, I recently read the following:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |